by STeve
This could easily be the worst idea of all time. I can't even fathom the idea let alone actually doing it. Give up next years 1st and this years and pay the guy A FUCKING FUCK load of money and he isn't even good? a spread offsense? surgery? Wow, holy fuck. i can't even imagine this to be remotely accurate no way. none. wow. A team with this many holes moving up trading away picks and tons of money on a question mark at best is like team suicide. It better be a cruel joke
I love the move.
ReplyDelete-Coast
I love the move.
ReplyDelete-Coast
If they're not spending $ on Clausen or Bradford then they're spending money on Mallet or Locker next year and possibly giving up picks to get them. You seem to understand that teams need a QB to win yet reject the idea of getting anybody but a retread or staying with proven failures like Brohm or Edwards.
ReplyDeleteOffensive tackles don't win football games.
This team needs minimum two solid years of rebuilding to be respectable. Why not get the best quarterback in the draft this year if we can? Nothing this pathetic franchise has done in the past decade has been worth a shit so why not think outside the box? I don't care if we trade 2011's first rounder. There might not even be a 2011 season anyways. If I need to watch 5 on the field this year at all I am going to strangle myself. If the word Brohm appears in another comment on this blog it is getting deleted. BRIAN BROHM IS A BUM. HE WILL NOT BE OUR QB. THERE IS A REASON HE WAS THIRD STRING IN GB AND ON THE PRACTICE SQUAD.
ReplyDelete-coast
brian brohm HALLLLLLLLA
ReplyDelete-steve
supreme clothing
ReplyDeletenike shoes
kd 11
yeezy boost 350 v2
longchamp
kyrie irving shoes
kyrie 6
vapormax
jordan shoes
jordan shoes
xiaofang20191215